Each statement below is quoted from the transcript at the second shown. Click the timestamp to hear it in context, including who is speaking. This is a selection from the research extract, not every statement made: the ones about how the method works and how certain its results are said to be.
Left out on purpose: statements that name or describe an individual. This site reviews a method. It does not repeat what was said about people.
Where each kind of statement is checked: certainty against what Google says about one-off spikes; the method against the eleven links and the tests; the qualifiers are part of where she has a point.
How certain the result is said to be 9
“I love soft data. I love inferences. I love reports. I love getting information. I love, you know, all of the different methods for data generation. I am totally open to, but I am a very, very big fan of hard data becaus”2026-07-09 2026-07-09, 12:32
“That's what I think. They're delightful. Don't make fun of me. Don't make fun of me. Now, as you guys know, I think that the hard data that we are able to generate based off of our trends, searches, specifically the imag”2026-07-13 2026-07-13, 18:55
“I'm sorry, my brain is tired. I shouldn't have waited till so late to film. I should think about this more. Now, one of the things that you guys probably know is that I think that the hard data that we are able to get ou”2026-07-13 2026-07-13, 19:22
“telling them something. That's why I think there really is a difference between leads, evidence, and proof. How does one conduct an investigation in an ethical way? Well, it occurs to me that you really do have to make s”2026-09-05 2026-09-05, 7:22
“That's a lot. However, part of what that list has provided us with is being able to separate out what the actual dates are and then take a look at what the relevance of those dates is. In my opinion, these are not random”2026-09-14 2026-09-14, 9:17
“These searches are not random. These searches actually make perfect sense as the days go on. Like, let's take August 27th, for example. August 27th is the day that that recon task force disbanded. As in, it is quite lite”2026-09-26 2026-09-26, 44:20
“I know people jump in and out of live streams. It has events as a part of it. It also has specific dates and individuals and locations and titles and, you know, but it's not random. That's the thing is that it's not rand”2026-09-26 2026-09-26, 1:49:42
“And isn't it just the funniest thing? So, OK, I've got September 8th. I've got a positive result. I've got, OK, my API digital visitor log. And that is my policy and money boss. On September 8th, I also have Christine an”2026-10-03 2026-10-03, 1:05:24
“I think this is who is there. I think that this is the guest list. And for me, it's not random. It's not, and it's not halfway. I mean, obviously you never know what individuals could hypothetically, but I've gone throug”2026-10-03 2026-10-03, 1:33:07
How the method is said to work 13
“I was just looking around Google Trends. Sometimes I'll just go to try to, I don't know, get a little inspiration or to just kind of go and see what I can see, right?”2026-07-09 2026-07-09, 15:13
“So Sierra Vista encompasses, you know, Tucson here, but they are not Phoenix.”2026-07-09 2026-07-09, 16:43
“But I'm just trying to show you guys how I established my baseline for what I was looking for, who I was looking for, and the naming conventions because they matter.”2026-07-09 2026-07-09, 33:16
“We're looking at Tucson, specifically Sierra Vista, which is the military town where Fort Huachuca is located, May 1st till September 9th, 2025. So between May 1st and June 16th, there's nothing. And then suddenly on June 16th, there is.”2026-07-13, on The Stew Peters Show 2026-07-13, 58:42 on Rumble
“Because again, these are in quotes. That's right. And look at these people being searched from Sierra Vista and Fort Huachuca between August 1st and September 10th.”2026-07-13, on The Stew Peters Show 2026-07-13, 1:26:59 on Rumble
“Yeah. So that image right there, I made sure to include Charlie Kirk as a baseline control.”2026-07-13, on The Stew Peters Show 2026-07-13, 1:46:09 on Rumble
“including the chief of staff, the both deputies and all of the, you know, the the gear tech bosses. That is exactly who is being image searched at Fort Huachuca.”2026-07-13, on The Stew Peters Show 2026-07-13, 1:52:13 on Rumble
“And so what I'm saying is these data clusters, you can tell that individuals are searching for specific terms in a small span of time.”2026-09-05 2026-09-05, 1:27:44
“Imagine my surprise when a variety of individuals, specifically from Crane, related to their microelectronics, as well as their drone swarm technology, while being Google image searched on the same day from Fort Banana.”2026-09-05 2026-09-05, 1:39:18
“There were, there were not other searches for him. It's like, as of the time of filming this, I'm like, who knows what the future will bring? Because as we know, they love to go in and manipulate the data on the backend.”2026-09-14 2026-09-14, 1:14:37
“So, like we know, our demonstration team appears to all have arrived 7th, 8th, and so.”2026-09-19 2026-09-19, 49:02
“what I like to find are data clusters. That for me is a little bit of a guiding light because I think to myself, gosh, was there something that was of particular interest during a particular time in a particular place?”2026-09-19 2026-09-19, 51:01
“I've done the superstars, and I haven't run into any of my superstars.”2026-09-19 2026-09-19, 2:28:15
The October 3 video 5
“It's because I realized, you know, is it possible that they don't know? Is it possible that they don't know? I mean, my thought was, okay, so, you know, whomever it is that's maybe creating this visitor passes or whateve”2026-10-03 2026-10-03, 5:09
“that they don't know where it's coming from. And if they don't know where it's coming from, might that mean that it's an automated system? And might it be that what we're looking at is something that is a system's vulner”2026-10-03 2026-10-03, 5:41
“Out of the 43 people that were the expected folks, you know, that showed up in the same ways by the same titles, 38 of those individuals all showed up on the same three days. There's only five outliers. I hope that makes”2026-10-03 2026-10-03, 29:52
“I wouldn't have been able to dig into, oh my gosh, are we looking at an automated system? So, I'm like, so. But as you guys can see, this isn't just random noise. I really do feel comfortable saying that. And the dates,”2026-10-03 2026-10-03, 1:17:58
“Just in case. And yes, and everything is a legend and in my opinion, and we're not accusing anyone of anything. But what I will say is that my real opinion is that this is awfully suspicious. And my real opinion is this”2026-10-03 2026-10-03, 1:19:59
Qualifiers and hedges, in her words 6
“those are their names and their images that were being searched in the area of Sierra Vista in the days immediately prior to when that demonstration was conducted. Maybe. Allegedly.”2026-07-09 2026-07-09, 1:20:49
“And I might bring all of them to Fort Banana to come and take a little look-see at what we were about to unleash. I'm not making an allegation against anyone.”2026-07-09 2026-07-09, 1:22:33
“so now this is total hypothesis and pure speculation but it would make sense if someone showed up late”2026-07-13, on The Stew Peters Show 2026-07-13, 1:18:31 on Rumble
“very, very unlikely. It's a very slim possibility that that's what was happening. It's much more likely that a military person, most likely an escort, was conducting that search”2026-07-13, on The Stew Peters Show 2026-07-13, 1:56:58 on Rumble
“i'm like for legal reasons none of this is an allegation of wrongdoing guys none of this is an allegation of wrongdoing um and no person that i talk about we're not convicting them however i have developed what i think are my real persons of interest”2026-09-05 2026-09-05, 7:47
“every single piece of data that i referred to in this episode is all data that's like first of all it's publicly verifiable a lot of it is”2026-09-05 2026-09-05, 2:41:52
The Stew Peters Show: the host's words 4
These are the host's statements about the data, from the episode she appeared on. They are his words, not hers, and are labelled as his wherever this site quotes them.
“We are about to go over a bank of information and evidence, real data that cannot be refuted, that cannot be explained away, that illustrates and confirms just how deep the betrayal went and how close to Charlie that was”Stew Peters, 2026-07-13, on The Stew Peters Show 2026-07-13, 45:38 on Rumble
“single-handedly the most damning evidence that anybody has talked about.”Stew Peters, 2026-07-13, on The Stew Peters Show 2026-07-13, 46:11 on Rumble
“It's not a wild conspiracy theory. It's not some idea or possible angle that we should look at. This is hard data that has been cross-checked. It has been verified. It has been run through the numbers.”Stew Peters, 2026-07-13, on The Stew Peters Show 2026-07-13, 49:48 on Rumble
“You can't explain it away. It's irrefutable, and it shows you exactly why the timing is so critical.”Stew Peters, 2026-07-13, on The Stew Peters Show 2026-07-13, 2:09:07 on Rumble
What the record shows
The chart shown on that episode was run again one day later with the same terms and settings, and did not come back the same. Her Stew Peters chart against the live re-run. Google says one-off spikes should not be read as evidence of individual searches.