The guest list, checked / Questions people ask
Short answers first, each with the place on this site where the record is laid out.
No. Google Trends shows how often a term was searched in a region compared with other times. It does not show who searched, and it does not show where any person was. The most a chart can say is that, by her method, a name got searched from the Tucson (Sierra Vista) market, which covers most of southern Arizona.
Not for a rare name. Google's Trends FAQ says “one-off spikes should not be interpreted as real search activity or evidence of individual searches.” A Google spokesperson said that for very uncommon terms Trends “may appear to show some search interest even if there were no actual searches.”
About 1 in 3 made-up or rare phrases shows a blip somewhere, and about 2 in 3 show nothing. The control tests used her region, dates and search type on invented names, cartoon characters and nonsense phrases.
No. Her searches were re-run on October 6, 2026 with her terms, region, dates and search type. Of 31 terms where her date is known, none came back within a day of her date.
The record shows a sample being redrawn, not data being removed. The same 119 searches run two hours apart gave different results: of 42 blips, 24 were gone, 17 had moved and 1 was the same. Google's FAQ says “Unlike Google Trends, Autocomplete is subject to Google's removal policies.”
No source shows that. Her only document is the GenAI.mil Gemini card. Google's deployment guide for Gemini for Government lists grounding with Google Search under unauthorized features to disable; the approved version searches Google Cloud's stored copy of the web, not google.com. Which version GenAI.mil runs has not been published.
GenAI.mil launched on December 9, 2025, three months after the dates her list is built on.
It is a television market of about 1.27 million people, not a building or a base. The smallest unit Google Trends reports is a city.
DEERS is the military ID-card database, not a visitor log. Visitors are checked in person at the gate, with an ID and a records check, and their photo is taken there. Biographies of official visitors come from the visitor's own office.
It did not in our test. For visits the Army itself documented in 2025, 23 name variants were searched with her settings and none showed a spike on the visit day.
She says “hundreds and hundreds,” and kept 43. Nobody knows her total number of searches, so nobody can compute exactly what chance alone would give. That limit cuts both ways.
In several places. She described Trends as a sampling method herself. She often adds a qualifier such as “allegedly” or “in my opinion.” She names outliers and warned that a plain common name proves nothing. Two of her charts for the same name agree with each other.
No. It is about a method, not a person. Nothing on this site says what anyone intended, and it does not allege that any named person committed a crime.