AFNPT Logo

Evidence Reviews

Public claims, checked against the record

Each review takes a claim made in public, quotes it with its source, and sets the record beside it. Where the record supports the person, the review says so.

Google Trends · Fort Huachuca

The Fort Huachuca guest list, checked

Do Google Trends spikes show who visited Fort Huachuca?

No. Ana Escobar says small spikes on officials' names are a visitor log of the Army base. Google's own documentation says a spike on a rare name does not mean anyone searched it, and the review's control searches found blips on made-up and cartoon names under her settings.

  • Her claim in her own words, link by link, with the clip for each
  • 1,404 control searches run with her settings, with screenshots and capture times
  • What Google, the Pentagon and the Army have published
  • Where she has a point, and the limits of our own tests
Read the review

Harpole v. Owens · M.D. Tenn. 3:26-cv-00556

Mitch Snow: the sworn record vs. the public record

Do Mitch Snow's sworn declarations match what he told the public?

Partly. Of eight questions reviewed, one sworn statement is directly contradicted by his own recorded words, and his public description of photographic evidence is not supported by his own account. On two questions the record supports him. No court has ruled on the merits.

  • Eight findings, each marked as cutting against him, supporting him, or open
  • The 49-page report with 32 exhibits
  • His declarations as filed, with margin notes
  • The fundraiser record, which supports his sworn statement that he received nothing
Read the review

Utah Valley University · September 10, 2025

The UVU Review

What does the official After-Action Report on the Charlie Kirk shooting say?

The 158-page report is walked through minute by minute on a 3D map of the campus. Every finding is quoted and linked to its page. The review reports what the documents say and does not draw conclusions about guilt or motive.

  • The report's findings, quoted with page numbers
  • A minute-by-minute timeline on the real campus
  • UVU Police Chief Jeff Long's released records
  • A report viewer that opens each cited page
Open the interactive map

State of Utah v. Tyler James Robinson

The Charlie Kirk case, from the public record

Who is charged, with what, and where does the case stand?

Tyler James Robinson is charged with seven counts, including aggravated murder, and has pleaded not guilty. On September 1, 2026 a judge sent the case to trial. No trial date has been set. He is presumed innocent.

  • Each of the seven counts and what the State alleges
  • Every court date, with its source
  • September 10, 2025 on campus, from the university's report
  • Where to read the documents yourself
Read the record

Latest news: the Google Trends claims

All articles on this →

Latest news: Mitch Snow and Harpole v. Owens

All articles on this →

Explainers

Can Google Trends show who visited a military base?

What the tool is, why it is not a “back end” or an “API” into a base, and what federal law says about actually accessing a government computer without authorization.

How a review is built

The claim comes first, in the person's own words

Each claim is quoted with its date and a link to the clip or filing, so anyone can hear or read it in context.

The record sits beside it

Official documentation, court filings, platform records and our own tests, each linked to where it can be checked.

Statements, not character

A review describes what was said and what the evidence shows. It does not state anyone's intent, motive or guilt.

What supports the person stays in

Findings that favour the subject are published in the same place as the ones that do not, along with the limits of our own work.

If you are named in a review and believe something is wrong, tell us. See our corrections policy or contact us. Corrections are published.

Share on X