News · Fact Check
Did Mitch Snow seek out Candace Owens, or did she contact him first?
Snow swore that Owens's side contacted him, not the other way around, and AFNPT found the record supports that account of who reached out first.
By Americans for Transparency · Published
The short answer
The record indicates Owens's side contacted Snow first. In a sworn declaration, Snow states that he did not seek out Candace Owens and that her side reached out to him. AFNPT reviewed his declarations against the available record and found it supports him on this point. No court has ruled on it, and the finding concerns who made contact, not whether Snow's wider account of Fort Huachuca is true.
- Snow swore that Owens's side contacted him, not the reverse.
- AFNPT's review found the record supports him on who reached out first.
- This concerns the sequence of contact, not the truth of the Fort Huachuca account.
- No court has ruled on the point.
The claim, and what the record shows
Claim 1 · Online commentary about the case
Mitch Snow sought out Candace Owens to get himself on her program.
Not supportedSnow swore that Owens's side contacted him first, and AFNPT found the available record supports that. Nothing AFNPT reviewed shows Snow initiating the contact. The finding is limited to who reached out first and does not establish whether his Fort Huachuca account is true.[1][2]
What Snow swore
In his sworn declarations in Harpole v. Owens, Snow states that he did not approach Candace Owens, and that her side contacted him. This is one of several sworn statements he has filed in the case docketed as No. 3:26-cv-00556.[1][2][3]
What the record shows
AFNPT compared his sworn statements with the available record. On the question of who made first contact, it found the record consistent with Snow's account: the available evidence points to Owens's side reaching out to him. AFNPT found no material showing Snow initiating the contact. The eight findings are here.[1]
What this does not settle
Who contacted whom is a narrow factual point. It does not establish whether Snow's account of being at Fort Huachuca is true, which no court has ruled on and AFNPT could not independently confirm. On other points, AFNPT's review found Snow's sworn record mixed: it supports him on the fundraiser money and on first contact, but one statement about whether he had watched Owens's program is contradicted by his own recorded words.[1]
Questions people ask
Does this mean Snow's whole account is accurate?
No. This finding is only about who made first contact. AFNPT could not independently confirm his wider account of Fort Huachuca, and no court has ruled on it.
Where does the evidence on first contact come from?
From Snow's sworn declarations and AFNPT's review of the available record. AFNPT found the record consistent with his statement that Owens's side reached out to him.
Sources
- [1]Americans for Transparency, Mitch Snow: The Sworn Record vs. the Public Record, October 7, 2026. AFNPT review
- [2]CourtListener / RECAP, Harpole v. Owens, No. 3:26-cv-00556 (M.D. Tenn.), docket sheet, October 12, 2026. Primary record
- [3]U.S. District Court, M.D. Tenn., Complaint, Harpole v. Owens, Doc. 1, April 30, 2026. Primary record